Opslag

Viser opslag fra februar, 2014

Nietzsche on Christians and anarchists

“The anarchist and the Christian have the same ancestry” “There is a perfect likeness between Christian and anarchist: their object, their instinct, points only toward destruction.” “The Christian and the anarchist: both are décadents ; both are incapable of any act that is not disintegrating, poisonous, degenerating, blood-sucking; both have an instinct of mortal hatred of everything that stands up, and is great, and has durability, and promises life a future[...]” (Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, H. L. Mencken. The Selected Writings of Friedrich Nietzsche . p. 618)

Barth on fellowship

"Fellowship is not an aggregate of individuals, nor is it an organism. In fact, Fellowship is no concrete thing at all. It is, rather, that Primal synthesis and relationship and apprehension of all distinct concrete things which is their final unobservable ONENESS. Fellowship is communion. It is, however, not a communion in which the 'otherness' of each particular individual is blurred or limited or dissolved, but that ONENESS which both requires the 'otherness' of each individual and makes sense of it. Fellowship is the ONE which lies beyond every 'other'. The ONE, the INDIVIDUAL, is therefore not one among others, not a cell in a larger organism, but simply the HOLY ONE - sanctus." (Barth, The Epistle to the Romans 1933, p. 443)

Hans Denck (1500-1527): Gelassenheit (yieldedness) as the solution to the problem of the (un)free will and evil.

Billede
Hans Denck 1500-1527 While Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466-1536) defended the idea that human beings have a free will to choose the good (anti-determinism), Martin Luther (1483-1546) defended the Augustinian idea that the human will is determined by God, and is thus unfree (determinism): God is 'absolute' and 'necessary', and thus determines human beings who are 'relative' and 'contingent' ( On the Bondage of the Will ). There is a third option, however.

So what exactly are the rules for Christian living? Is the bible a 'moral authority'?

Billede
James J. Tissot - Pharisees ask Christ about the Greatest Commandment "`Teacher, which [is] the great command in the Law?' And Jesus said to him, `Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thine understanding -- this is a first and great command; and the second [is] like to it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself; on these -- the two commands -- all the law and the prophets do hang.'" (Matt 22:36-40, YLT) I've stumbled into some discussions lately about Christian ethics (so-called). It's the usual 'yes, love, but ...' thing. For some reason some Christians want all kinds of rules, besides the commandment to love others. The bible, these people say, is a 'moral authority'. Hence they sometimes reiterate Matt 22:36-40, where Jesus explains a Jewish Pharisee that the great(est) commandments in the Law is to love God and your neighbor. But in order to know what it means to love God, the arg